Writing

 What do you think about using animals for scientific research? Then, do you think using animals for scientific research is inhumane? I think this is about which lives you would sacrifice for scientific research because scientists need to test things that they made or found in animals or people. I'm sure that most people think that they are more willing to sacrifice animals' lives than their lives, and I think this is very normal, because other people are of the same species, and animals are different species. And most species would react the same way because they would not like to sacrifice one of them, and they would have a fear inside that maybe they will be the test subject later in the future. So, we need to test some things related to science on animals or people to see the result. And for some things, these things are unnecessarily needed. But there are some people who do the scientific research including animals when the result is already widely known. I don't know ...

 Do you know the difference between prisoners and convicted prisoners? Then, what do you think convicted prisoners should not have better living conditions than those not in prison? I think convicted prisoners should not have better living conditions than those not in prison, because if they are going to go to prison except for some people who pay money not to go to prison, it would be a good practice for them to get used to conditions similar to a prison. Most convicted prisoners will go to prison for some period of time-based on their crime, and it might be hard for them to just go to the prison and get used to there. And for some people who are not in prison might think that it might be unfair for them if convicted prisoners have better living conditions than them, and I think it really doesn't matter because they will be in bad condition soon enough. So, it would be good for them to have a little time left before the prison in a good condition, and maybe they might act well in ...

 What do you think about the recycled water? Then, what do you think are the advantages of recycling water? I'm pretty sure that most of the water we use is recycled because there is a limited amount of fresh water on the Earth. And if we don't use the water that we used, then we won't have any freshwater to use. As far as I know, the waters we used go through some system that will make the water clean again. During the water go through this system, it goes through several filters that will filter out dirty things from the water. And I think they make the water additionally clean by putting some powders that will make the water be clean, and after some other processes, we will use those water again and it will repeat this process over and over. So, let me tell you the advantages of recycling water. The first advantage is we can use water without the worry that there is a limited amount of fresh water we can use, since we can recycle water, we don't need to worry about d...

 Do you work at home? Then, do you think working from home is good for the environment? I think working from home doesn't really affect any stuff to the environment, because people make a very small amount of pollution when they go and come back from the work. So, it will really not affect that much to the environment, but it will affect the environment slowly. Since going to work can affect the environment slowly, do you need to work at home for the environment? I think you can choose to work at home or not, because as I mentioned before, going to work doesn't really affect any stuff to the environment. I think this question is like should students study at home instead of riding the school bus or car for the environment. So, this question is ridiculous, and you really don't need to work at home for the environment. But, it might be better for the environment if you see the big picture, because, over time, the environment is going to get worse. And do you want to leave a b...

 Are you vegetarian? Then, do you think vegetarianism is an ecologically thoughtful lifestyle? I think vegetarianism is not that ecologically thought lifestyle, because if there are too many animals in nature. Then the animals will eat all of the plants, and the environment will fail. When the environment fails, it will take several decades for that environment to be rebuilt. Also, it really doesn't matter to nature even though a person is vegetarian because most of the vegetables and meats we eat are not from the wild nature. So, being vegetarian really doesn't make the environment get better, so I think vegetarianism is not an ecologically thoughtful lifestyle. However, some people claim that vegetarianism will help the environment by killing fewer animals. Of course, killing fewer animals is better, but killing fewer animals will not do much to help the environment for the reason I said before. Now, let me tell you about the advantages and disadvantages of being vegetarian, ...

 Do you ride hybrid vehicles? Then, do you think alternative energy and hybrid vehicles can help save our planet? I think just using alternative energy and hybrid vehicles can't save our planet, because there are still a lot of other problems that cause our planet to be not saved. But using alternative energy and hybrid vehicles will help to save our planet, but it won't be enough amount to save the planet. When we use alternative energy and hybrid vehicles, it will slow down our planet from dying. But it won't save our planet completely by just using alternative energy and hybrid vehicles. To save our planet, we need to prevent people from doing things that are harmful to our planet, if enough people continuously do this, then I think we can save our planet. However, some people believe just using alternative energy and hybrid vehicles can help save our planet. Well, this can be true, because using alternative energy and hybrid vehicles are helping a little. But if a small...

 What do you think about deforestation? Then do you think the destruction of the world’s forests is justified by the human need for land and food? I think the destruction of the world's forests is not justified by the human need for land and food, because before people destructed the forests, people lived well. So, why would we need to destruct forests when we were able to live without destructing forests? In the past, people lived without destructing forests, and they were able to live very well. But people started to destruct forests, and the reason might be factories, farms, etc. As our technology evolved, we needed more factories, to have more factories, we need more land to build factories. So, people destructed forests and got the land for factories. And since they can't destruct all of the forests, some of them took the land of farms. Then the farmers needed lands to continue their farms, so they destructed the forests to get their lands for the farm. But can the destruc...

 Do you think renewable energies should be popularized? Then, how do you think the USA can use renewable energy, and what role oil companies can play? I think the USA can use renewable energy by encouraging people to put on solar panels on their roofs, then people will use renewable energy which is solar energy in this case. Other ways that the USA can use renewable energy are banning people from using nonrenewable energy, then people will need to use renewable energy. But to do this thing, the government would need to make laws about banning citizens of the USA from using nonrenewable energy. Also, the government would need to give some time for people to get ready for using only renewable energies, if they don't, then people will need to spend a lot of money to change things that use nonrenewable energy into things that use renewable energy. Then the citizens of the USA would have time to prepare for using renewable energy, and some people might not agree with the government bann...

 Are you multilingual? Then, do you think foreign language instruction should begin in kindergarten? I think it would be okay to begin foreign language instruction in kindergarten because of many reasons. The first reason is many pieces of research say that it is much easier to learn languages when we are young, so it would be easier for kindergarteners to learn a new language than learning a new language when they are older. The second reason is learning a foreign language can help students to increase their grades in other subjects, and if a student already knows how to speak several languages, then the student's grades would be better than students who are monolingual. The third reason is learning a foreign language at a young age would make a student speak a foreign language as a native speaker faster than learning a foreign language as a hobby. However, some people claim that learning a foreign language in kindergarten would make kindergarteners forget both the languages; kind...

 Did you bring your mobile phone to the school as a student or if you are a teacher, do you bring your mobile phone to the school? Then, do you think mobiles phones should be banned in schools for both students and teachers? Nowadays, most people have mobile phones, and people carry their mobile phones all the time. And that means that students and teachers bring their phones to the school, too. Also, there is not really a time for students and teachers to use their phones, then why do you think students and teachers bring their phones to the school? I think students and teachers bring their phones to school because I guess it feels comfortable or better to have their phones around. I think mobile phones are now like glasses, you would wonder what I mean by mobile phones equal to glasses. People who wear glasses can see without glasses, but it would look more blurry. And they wear glasses to be able to see things more clearly, and glasses help these people. So, mobile phones are li...

 Some schools have dress codes and some don't, and do you think there should be a dress code to prevent students from wearing revealing clothes? Schools that have dress codes would have a rule that students can't wear revealing clothes, but in schools that don't have any dress codes, some students would wear revealing clothes. Even though there are no dress codes, some teachers would tell students who are wearing revealing clothes to cover revealing parts. But most students would not listen to teachers, because there is no dress code that tells them to not wear revealing clothes. Then, some teachers would like to make dress codes, and if most of the teachers and counselors agree, then the dress code will be made. And most of the students will know that, so most of them will try to listen to what their teachers are saying. So, I think dress codes really don't need to exist, but there will be some students who will not listen to the teachers. And the dress codes will be a...

 Do you know how to do sign language? Then, do you think schools should offer sign language in addition to foreign languages? I think it would be good for students to learn sign language in addition to foreign languages because sign language is another form of language that many people use to speak. And did you know that many countries have little bit different forms of sign languages? Sign language is one form of language, therefore schools should offer sign languages in addition to foreign languages. And it would be a very unique experience in their life, and we don't know if some of them will become sign language teachers or other jobs related to sign languages. Also, students who know how to do sign language can use sign language to speak with each other without most people knowing what they are talking about. And, those students will be able to talk to students or friends who can only speak sign language, then they would be able to make more friends. Then it would be such a wo...

 What do you think about the wealth tax, do you think it should be lowered or be increased? Then do you think decreasing the wealth tax is good for the economy? I think decreasing the wealth tax would be bad for the economy, because the government will earn less money to develop things. When the government has a lot of money, it can spend that money in many places. But when they don't have a lot of money, they need to spend less money in some places. And you might be wondering how this can help to grow the economy. When the government has more money, they will be going to do infrastructure projects to make more jobs. When there is a big infrastructure project going on, many people will come and try to work. And I think that infrastructure project might be about huge bridges because the government will think that it will be better if they have bridges that could shorten the time to go someplace to the destination. When people finish building that bridge or whatever infrastructure pr...