Writing

 What do you think about talking on the phone while driving? Then, do you think talking on the phone while driving should be banned? I think talking on the phone while driving does not need to be restricted, but people should be careful when they are talking on the phone while driving. I think talking on the phone while driving does not need to be restricted because talking on the phone is the same as talking to someone in the car except the driver needs to press their device a few times. So, I don't see any reason why you should ban talking to a person who is in the car, so people should not ban talking on the phone while driving. Even though I think people should not ban talking on the phone while driving, I think people should ban people from watching their devices or something like books should be banned since they would not be able to see the situation and they might get into car accidents. However, listening and saying things are fine since you can see and understand the situ...

 What do you think about the voting age? Then, do you think the voting age should be lowered? I think the voting age can stay as it is because I see no reason to lower the voting age since if people are older they will be able to make wiser decisions. And if people vote when they are not wise enough, they will make decisions that might be not good for them. However, they will learn from mistakes so they will become wiser and wiser as they make mistakes, but it is really bad to make mistakes on voting since you will be voting for something important to the country. If the country votes and elects a person who is greedy and does not think about citizens, they made a mistake and it will be hard for them during this person serves the position this person is in. Even though they made mistakes, they will learn something valuable from them and try not to make the same mistake again. Learning from mistakes is not really a good reason for lowering the voting age since there are a lot of pla...

 What do you think about smoking? Then, do you think the smoking age should be lowered? I think the smoking age should not be reduced, because smoking is bad for people, and if people get used to smoking early age, the damage of tobacco will going to increase. Then, they would get more damage from those harmful substances from tobacco will spread faster than people who started smoking when they can smoke. And I personally think smoking should be banned since it is just so harmful to poeple, and I don't get why they smoke and try to get unhealthy, However, I don't have any power to ban smoking and there will be a lot of people who will be against this, so it would be hard to ban smoking but there will be a way to make people smoke less. Do you think it is a wise choice to let children experience such dangerous substances that would harm them in many ways? The answer is it would not be a wise choice to let children experience these dangerous substances, and we need to keep danger...

 What do you think about driving after consuming alcohol? Then, do you think those who are caught driving after consuming alcohol should lose their driver’s license for one year? I think losing their driver's license for one year for driving after consuming alcohol is a little bit too much, because of course driving after consuming alcohol is dangerous, but I think losing driving license for a year might a too much. This would not matter to people who follow the rules and not drive after they consumed alcohol, but many people drink beers all the time, so a lot of people will going to lose their driver's license. And it would be bad for people since they would not be able to drive for a year, and someone elas will need to drive for them. This will not going to matter for people who live in big cities since there are a lot of publie transportations in the city, but if people living in places where it is not really big cities, they will need to spend a lot of money or they will ne...

 What do you think about organ donation? Then, do you think organ donation should be mandatory? I think organ donation should not be mandatory since not all people would want to donate their organs for many different reasons some people believe that organ donation is bad because of their religion or some people might have a fear about taking their organs out of their bodies. And you can't just force someone to do something that the person does not want to do, and it could make citizens of that country think that the government is not thinking about the citizens of the country, Also, if everyone donates their organs, there will be so many organs not used. And those organs will be needed to be thrown away if they are not been used for a long time, and if they were not used why did they need to donate those organs when no one is using them? Of course, some people might need those organs, but poeple will not going to need a lot of organs and those organs will be too old to use. However...

 What do you think about asylum? Then, do you think illegal immigrants should receive asylum? Before I get started if you don't know what asylum means in this passage, it basically means protection for immigrants. The word 'asylum' has different meanings, but that meaning is what asylum means in this context. So, I think illegal immigrants should not receive asylum because they migrated to this country illegally, and legal problems can happen between countries if the government gives asylum to illegal immigrants. It would be better to not give asylum to illegal immigrants because they migrated into this country illegally, and they would have their stories of why they needed to migrate to this country, but they did it illegally. Of course, they would have a story about why they could not migrate to this country legally. However, the country will have some kind of problems with other countries and its own country since some countries would like to have those illegal immigrant...

 What do you think about things related to voting? Then, do you believe voting should be compulsory for all citizens? I think voting should not be compulsory for all citizens because people have reasons that they can't participate in things, and they might have some events so they might not be able to participate in voting for something related to the government. When it is a voting day for the president, they let the citizens not go to school and their work so they can participate in the voting, but they don't do that for other votings that are not presidential vote. So, this means that people would not be able to participate in those votings since they would need to go to their jobs, and there will be very few people who would have time to participate since they would need to go to their work, and when they finish their work, the time will be something like 6'o clock or something like that. Then, if they have children, they would need to prepare their children for their s...

 What do you think about minors not getting a murder trial? Then, do you think minors should be tried for murder at any age? I think minors should be tried for murder at any age since if they think that they can murder anybody since they are minors, it would be really bad for them and other people. Then, a lot of people would have been murdered if there was a minor who thought like that. So, it would be good to make sure that minors that will get a trial if they murder somebody, then minors would not try to murder someone on purpose. And it would be kind of fair since minors would get a trial for the crime they did, and some adults would be kind of happy about that since some adults want minors to get a trial for the crime they did. I think for now if minors get to trial, they are sent to prison as kids, and they would be in a place where it is a prison but prisoners are only kids or minors. I don't really know about it, but I wonder how minors go to prison when they don't have...

 What do you think about neutralizing pets? Then, do you believe spaying and neutering pets should be mandatory? I think it is not really necessary to spay and neuter pets since it really does not does any harm to people when they don't neuter and sterilize them. So, I think there isn't really any harm if they don't neuter their pets since they lived that way for a very long time, I think these pets' ancestors existed longer than humans, and they didn't neuter themselves in the last several thousand years, and even though when the human-made them to pets, they didn't neuter them, they only started doing it recently. So, this shows that neutering and spaying pets are not really necessary to do, so there is not really a good reason to neuter and spay their pets. However, the reason that people only started neutering pets might be because there was not really a good technology to do it, and it might not have been safer for pets to neutralize. I think there is no re...

 What do you think about banning smoking in public places? Then, do you think banning smoking in public places is undemocratic? I think banning smoking in public places is not really undemocratic, because smoking is bad for you, and if the smoke that forms while you are smoking gets into other people's lungs, it would cause the same thing as the person who smoked. So, it would be better for everyone if people who smoke are banned from smoking in public places since they could cause damage to other people's lungs because of their actions. Also, some poeple who smoke might not know that smoke that is formed during smoking can affect other people, and smoking is known to cause lung cancer and other things. And it would be bad if they didn't know that smoke formed during smoking can cause the same thing as the things caused to people who are smoking. However, some people claim that smoking is their choice, so they have the freedom to smoke anywhere. Also, they claim that smokin...

 What do you think about couples who are adopting from overseas? Then, do you think couples should be banned from adopting overseas? I think banning couples from adopting overseas is not really necessary, because it is their choice on which children they want to adopt. And there are not really disadvantages to adopting children from overseas, but there might be some disadvantages of adopting children overseas. So, let's talk about the advantages and disadvantages of adopting children from overseas. The advantages of adopting overseas might be that adopted children might have a better life when they move overseas and live there. Let's say this country is not that rich, and the children who are orphans living in this country will get to have a better life if they are adopted overseas. Another advantage is that children will be able to have parents to take care of them, and this applies to all other adoptions, but it is still an advantage of adopting overseas. Now, let's talk ...

 What do you think about the price of prescription drugs? Then, do you think the cost of prescription drugs should be regulated? I think the U.S should have a better way about their hospital and stuff since it just costs too much. So, if the U.S can have a better way for hospitals and stuff, the price of prescription drugs will go down. The price of prescription drugs in the U.S costs about twice as much as in other countries, so it might not look that good. Still, if you consider the GDP of the U.S and the GDP of other countries, poeple in the U.S earn more money, but twice as much is a lot, so they should regulate it or make their hospital system better. And you know not all people in the U.S earns a lot of money, I think most of them would not have money to go to the hospital like every day or so. So, it would be better if they just look at other countries' hospital systems and copy some of them to make the hospital system in the U.S to be better. If they copy hospital systems f...

 What do you think about retirement? Then, do you think retirement should be made compulsory at the age of 60? I think it would not be fair for people since they would need to retire, and if they don't have enough money when they retire, they would run out of money as they live after they retired. So, I think they should give option on whether they are going to work or retire at the age of 60, and maybe people who retired at the age of 60 can get more money than when people who worked more when they retire. Anyway, it would not be fair for people because some people might want to just work more or they might need more money before they retire. So, it might be fair for everyone if companies let people work even though they are past the age of 60. But it might not be fair for companies or it might be fair since the companies can have skilled people for their employees and the bad thing is that it would be better for companies if they have more new poeple for employees to learn techni...

 What do you think about plastic surgery? Then, do you believe plastic surgery should be illegal for anyone under 18? I think it would be good to make plastic surgery to become illegal for anyone under 18 because if you think about plastic surgery, the word plastic surgery is the combination of the words plastic and surgery. So, even though you don't know what the word plastic surgery means, you can guess it into surgery involving plastic, and you might think it might be dangerous since it would be that you put plastics in you. And people who are younger than 18 are still growing up, and it might be dangerous if they do plastic surgery since they would have plastic inside them, and the plastics inside of them might change place or shift while they are growing up. Then, this would be dangerous, since the plastic inside your body might just be floating or moving around your body, and these plastics might be bad for your health since they might dissolve while it is moving around your ...