Writing

 What do you think about vacations? Then, do you think workers should get four weeks of paid vacation each year? I think it would actually increase the quality of the work the workers and employees do if they have four weeks of paid vacation each year, because when they com back from their vacations, they would feel refreshing. And when they feel refreshing, they would be able to make and produce products with better quality since they would not feel tired since they came back from the vacation. Also, it would be better for workers and employees since they would still get paid while they are on their vacations, and this could make these workers and employees to think that they should work better for their company since they are giving money to their workers and employees while they are in the vacation. And the atmosphere of the company would feel better since everyone would not have much stress, so they would feel more happier than when they don't get four weeks of paid vacation ea...

 What do you think about fireworks? Do you like them or do you not like them? Then, do you think you should have to take a training class to purchase fireworks? I think it would be better since nowadays there are fires caused by fireworks, and these wildfires can spread very fast. And we don't know how fast it will going to spread, and this fire will spread in the direction of the wind. Also, the times that people fire fireworks are usually dry and windy, so the fire will spread more quickly than when people fire fireworks on a wet and not windy day. Then, this fire will be going to cause a lot of damage to people's houses, stuff, etc. So, it would be better for everyone if they took training classes to purchase and fire fireworks, and it would be better if they need to take these classes once or twice to purchase fireworks and fire them. Also, when the district is saying that you should not buy fireworks, and it would be better for the district if poeple who took training clas...

 What do you think about aggressive dog breeds like Pit Bulls? Then, do you think Pit Bulls and other aggressive dog breeds should not be allowed? I think maybe they should do this as same as the system in the Harry Potter series because in the Harry Potter series they use Xs to show how dangerous this animal is. And they ban normal wizards or witches from raising them, but they let people with enough knowledge and experience in these animals and raise them to raise these dangerous animals. So, this system might work, but many people will not be able to raise the dog breeds that they raised because now experienced people can only raise them. And another problem is how will people know if they are experienced enough to raise these aggressive dog breeds? Maybe I think they can make some kind of license for raising aggressive dog breeds, and people can get them by testing how much they know about these aggressive dog breeds and how well they can control their breeds. This is one of th...

 What do you think about the laws to protect victims of domestic abuse? Then, do you believe laws to protect the victims of domestic abuse should be enforced? I think it would be better for victims of domestic abuse if the laws to protect the victims of domestic abuse are being enforced. Since the victims of domestic abuse would have gotten hurt, and when there are laws to protect these victims, then they would not get hurt anymore. Then, they would be able to live a normal life when the laws are protecting them, and they would feel more happy. Also, victims of domestic abuse would feel more safe when the laws are protecting them since the law will protect them somehow, so they would not need to worry about getting hurt or like that after the laws are protecting them. However some people might say that the laws would not going to protect them when they get older, and this would be likely to be true, but when they get older, they would be able to protect themselves or get more help ...

 What do you think about the death penalty? Then, do you think the death penalty should exist? I think the death penalty is not really necessary, because there are other ways to punish criminals who originally needed to get the death penalty. And most countries in the world did not execute anyone in the last 10 years. Only some of them have the death penalty as legal and had executed anyone in the last 10 years. It is true that the death penalty is legal in many countries but most countries had not executed anyone in the last 10 years or they only allow the death penalty for extreme cases such as war crimes. So, even though the death penalty is legal, many countries had not executed anyone nowadays. And there is no point in executing people because executing people is cruel and there are better ways that are not executing people but getting what they deserve. One example is that this person or criminal can stay in the prison for the rest of his life, then it is similar to the death...

 What do you think about divorce? Then do you think it should be harder to get a divorce? I think getting a divorce should not get harder because some people might have a hard time with their marriage, and it might be bad for them if getting a divorce is harder. So, it would be better for everyone if it stays the same on the level of getting a divorce, and it would really going to take a lot of time to get a divorce if it gets more complicated. And something could happen while people are getting a divorce, and people might get hurt while they are in the process of getting divorced. So, getting a divorce is a free will that people should have if they want to, and it can solve problems between people who are married. Divorce might not be the best choice all the time, but it can be a good choice at some times. However, some people claim that letting people get divorced so easily will make people get easier to cause crimes related to divorce. And, this can be true, but getting divorced...

 What do you think about the relationship or connection between drugs, crimes, and violence? Then, do you think making drugs illegal creates an environment for crime and violence? I think making drugs illegal would not create an environment for crime and violence, because now drugs are illegal in most places, and that did not create make place for crime and violence. This means that most people would not try to do a crime or cause violence because drugs are illegal things. Most poeple would just think that it would be good because the drug is now illegal, and only some people would not like that because they are related to drugs somehow. So, the world would not become an environment for crime and violence because of some people who are related to drugs. But sometimes, some places might become the environment for crime and violence because of some people who are related to drugs and they might be head of the crime gang. And they could make an environment for crime and violence, and ...

 What do you think about the products that are believed to cause cancer? Then, do you think any products that are believed to cause cancer should have a warning label? I think it would not be fair for companies who make those products since many people would not try to buy their products since those products are believed to cause cancer. I think people should run tests if these products can cause cancer or not. So, it might be fair for everyone if they at least do one test to prove if these products can cause cancer or not, then people could decide whether they are going to buy them or not by looking at whether they could cause cancer or they really would not going to cause cancer. I think they could have different tiers of warning labels. Like if it is just people thinking that this product could cause cancer, this product will have a green label. When this product has been tested once and the result is that it might cause cancer will have the yellow-green label. When this product...

 What do you think about garbage disposal? Then, do you think garbage disposal should not be free to encourage recycling (example: Switzerland)? I think many poeple already recycle things that they want to use again, so I think there is no need to make garbage disposal not become free to encourage people to recycle things. People need to dispose of their garbage anyway, and there are things that you can't recycle. So, it might not be fair to people who recycle a lot of things and need to dispose of non-recyclable garbage. And some people might try to dispose of their garbage in trash cans in public places to avoid paying for the disposal of garbage. Then, there will be tons of garbage in public trash cans, and it will be bad for people who own buildings that have public trash cans since they would need to pay money in order to dispose of other people's garbage. So, there can be a lot of problems if the government starts to make people pay money in order to dispose of their garb...

 What do you think about people who drive electric or hybrid vehicles? Then, do you think the government should give tax exemptions to those who drive electric or hybrid vehicles? I think the government should provide tax exemptions to those who drive electric or hybrid vehicles only for a certain period of time because that would be enough for people to start driving electric or hybrid vehicles. And most poeple would not try to change their electric or hybrid vehicles into vehicles that use gas after the period of time when the government gives tax exemptions ended. So, enough amount of time will be enough for people to start driving electric or hybrid vehicles, and many people will start to drive electric or hybrid vehicles. This means that not a lot of pollution is going to happen, and there will be more places where people can charge their electric or hybrid vehicles. If the government is trying to make people drive eco-friendly vehicles, this means that the government wants to...

 What do you think about driving speed limits? Then, do you think driving speed limits should be lifted in areas with low accident risk? I think driving speed limits should not be lifted in areas with low accident risk since it would make more accidents happen in those areas. Also, if they lift the driving speed limit in those areas, people might not care about driving speed limits in other areas. Then, a lot of accidents will be going to happen, and the government will just going to apply driving speed limits to those areas again. So, it will be useless for the government to just lift driving speed limits if they are going to just apply it again someday. Also, there is a chance that a lot of people will just not know if driving speed limits are lifted or not, so there are chances that there might not be more accidents. However, we really don't know if they know about it or not, so it would be better to just keep it. And it will take some time for online maps to update their maps w...

What do you think about the flag of New Zealand? Then, do you think the New Zealand flag should not be changed? I believe citizens of New Zealand should decide if they want to change the flag of their country or not. And if they don't want to change the flag of their country, then they should not adjust it, but if they want to change their country's flag, then they should. There are no wrong things about choosing if they wish to change the flag of their country or not. So, let me tell you both sides' opinions with reasons that support the opinion. The first opinion is that they should change the flag of New Zealand, their reasons are that they are not even territory of the United Kingdom, so there is no reason for them to have the Union Jack on their flag, and the flag looks too similar with the flag of Australia. And these reasons look pretty reasonable since New Zealand is not the territory of the United Kingdom, there is no reason for them to have the Union Jack on their...

 What do you think about terrorism? Then, do you believe terrorism is a significant issue in the world because innocent people are affected? I think terrorism is a significant issue in the world since terrorists will hurt innocent civilians during terrorizing places with a lot of civilians. And it would be unfair for those innocent civilians if they died during terror and the government thought that this terror was insignificant terrorism. Then, other places in that country might get terrorized by the group or a person who terrorized the place before, and a lot of innocent civilians will going to die. So, it is important that people realize that terrorism is a significant issue because they don't know if they are going to pass away or get hurt while terrorized by terrorists. If many people know that terrorism is a significant issue, they would not try to terrorize in order to make the government to looks at what they believe in. Also, if many people realize that terrorism is a sign...