Writing

 What do you think about TV cop shows? Then, do you think TV cop shows are too intense for children? I think TV cop shows are too intense and not really appropriate for children. For example, TV cop shows include criminals who committed crimes and cop shows also include catching criminals which can be pretty intense. Therefore, TV cop shows could be too intense for children to watch. TV cop shows are shows in which cops catch criminals, and they catch criminals for some reason. And the process of catching criminals can be too intense for children, but there are also TV cop shows that are not too intense; they are more comedy than intensity. However, most TV cop shows do not usually include comedy, so most TV cop shows could be considered too intense for children to watch. Things such as catching criminals using weapons, intensity when a criminal also has a weapon, when a criminal commits a crime, etc. could make TV cop shows to be too intense for children. And it is actually true, ...

 What do you think about media violence? Then, do you think media violence does lead to behavioral problems? I think media violence does not lead to behavior problems, because children might act a little bit violently after watching something violent or actions. Still, they will soon come back to how they acted before. Also, if they become older, they realize that media is media which means that things in media are fake if you are watching movies or tv series. So, they might talk about what the character did and how they acted and they might copy them for a short period, but they will go back to how they were before. I believe no one would really murder someone because they saw someone murdering someone in those media; movies, tv series, etc. People know what they should not do to other people and they don't do them. And that thought is not going to change even though they watched media with violence. There might be some people who are motivated by watching the violence in media, b...

 What do you think about watching reality television shows? Then, do you think reality television makes people stupid and should be regulated? I think reality television does not make people stupid. People could learn bad habits from watching reality television, but I think watching them does not make people stupid. I think they are saying things like if you watch some action movies, you become violent. And people do not really become violent after watching action movies; some might want to copy actions in the movies, but they don't become violent. So, even though people on reality television do stupid things, people might copy some of them for some minutes and they will go back to how they were. Some poeple might take some part of the action people did on reality television, but they would not do stupid things all the time, they will know when and where they need to do those actions. When people watch reality television, they laugh. Laughing does not make you stupid, actually, it ...

 What do you think about movies that are based on books? Then, why do you think books are better than their movies? The reason why books are better than their movies is books can reuse their characters and other things unlimitedly, but for movies, actors need to act them, so characters would not be able to appear every time they were supposed to appear. Also, if there is a problem with an actor or actress, they will need to replace their actor or they will need to remove that character from movies. An example of the character being removed is Crabbe in Harry Potter series, this actor got removed from 2 movies and replaced with a different character because this actor had some problems. Another reason is there are ways characters are described in the books, and there usually can't be a person who exactly fits the character's descriptions. So, in most of cases, fans complain about characters looking different in the movie version of the books. Also, there are some movies with gre...

 What do you think is better popular literature or classic literature? Then, do you think popular literature is not as valuable as classical literature? I think popular literature is as valuable as classical literature because classical literature was once popular literature when it came out or when it was popular enough that it was considered popular literature. Also, we don't know popular literature that we are reading right now will be considered as classical literature in the future, so I think all classical literature started as popular literature since all of that classical literature would have been famous at least once. There can be some works of literature that were not famous when it was released but they got famous after some years, and some examples are the artworks of Vincent Van Gogh, his works were not literature, but his artworks got famous after he died and were considered as classical artwork at the same time. So, there are some cases where it just becomes both of...

 What do you think about the author Edgar Allen Poe? Then, do you think Edgar Allen Poe’s career as an author benefitted from his difficult, grief-filled life? I think being an author benefitted from the difficult, grief-filled life of Edgar Aleen Poe because being an author made his life less difficult and grief-filled life. If you don't know the life Edgar Allen Poe lived, let me explain it to you briefly. Edgar's parents died when he was young, and he was raised by a wealthy entrepreneur. Then, he went to school, but he got thrown out of that school because of gambling and stuff. Then he went to the military and got thrown out of the military, too. And he started writing things and walked the path of an author. So, his parents died when he was young, and he was raised by a wealthy entrepreneur. Then, he got thrown out of school and the military because of different reasons. So, I think his life was difficult and grief-filled, and being an author would have helped his life to...

 What do you think about the tragic play Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare? Then, do you think Shakespeare romanticizes youth suicide in the tragic play, Romeo and Juliet? So, most people will know who William Shakespeare is, and most people will know he made a lot of plays, and "Romeo and Juliet" is one of them. If you don't know the story of "Romeo and Juliet", it is a tragic love story of Romeo and Juliet. So, I think Shakespeare did not romanticize youth suicide in the tragic play, Romeo and Juliet, because I think it made the story more tragic. I think suicide in Romeo and Juliet made the love between them look more tragic and sad, and I think suicide was just one of the ways Shakespeare used to make the story more tragic. I don't think that Shakespeare was trying to romanticize youth suicide, because most people think that youth suicide is a sad tragic thing, and Shakespeare knew that it was a sad and tragic thing to happen, so he added that to R...

 What do you think about the payment of your job or other people's jobs? Then, do you think there should be equal pay for equal work? I think it depends on which job it is because there are 2 types which the company gives money, The first way is that you need to work for a certain amount of hours and you get paid, the second way is that you complete a certain amount of things and you get paid. I think the company can decide to give more money if a person is doing a good job if they are working for a certain amount of hours, and they should give less if a person is just playing around when they are supposed to be working on something. However, if they are working for a certain amount of things, they can't just give more money to someone since they are getting the same work done. I think it would be fair if all poeple get the same pay for equal work, but I think not all people think like that. People worked the same amount of time or finished working on the same amount of things,...